Visitors: 1383

  MAZEDAN DIGITAL LIBRARY    

  JOURNAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

MDL
JMS  
MAZEDAN DIGITAL LIBRARY

Work Engagement and Efficacy of Teachers for Pupils’ Self-Learning Performance

JOURNAL:MAZEDAN EDUCATIONAL REVIEWS AND TEACHING METHODS

Download pdf

# Authors First Online DOI Downloads Citations
1. JONA MAE F. VERDON*, MARIETA D. CAYABAS 19 Aug 2022 na 1 0

Abstract

The study mainly determined the work engagement and efficacy of teachers for pupils’ self-learning performance. It utilized the descriptive-correlation research design to describe the data taken from the respondents chosen through purposive sampling. Moreover, it employed Pearson Product Moment Correlation/Pearson r and Multiple regression analysis were used to test the hypothesis of the study. The teachers were highly engaged and efficient in their work for pupils’ self-learning performance in math and reading. Teachers’ work engagement and efficacy had a significant correlation with the pupils’ self-learning performance. Also, teachers’ work engagement and efficacy significantly influenced the pupils’ self-learning performance. In conclusion, increased teacher engagement and efficacy raise student achievement scores. Being highly engaged in their social responsibilities toward teaching, the pupils will have the opportunity to enhance their social skills in learning mathematics and reading skills.


Keywords

Work Engagement, Efficacy, Self-Learning Performance, Philippines


References
  1. Achenbach, T.M., & Rescorla, L.A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families

    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Work Engagement. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom110009

    Bakker, A., B., Schaufeli, W., B., Leiter, M., P. and Taris, T., W. (2008), “Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology”. Work & Stress, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 187- 200.